|
|
|
|
|
|
Criteria
|
Outstanding
|
Superior
|
Good
|
Substandard
|
Failure
|
Content: Brief History of Company
|
0.63 points
Brief history of company is described accurately and comprehensively delivering all relevant information.
(0..567 - 0.63)
|
0.5355 points
Brief history of company is described sufficiently but is not completely accurate or comprehensive and is missing relevant information.
(0.504 - 0.566)
|
0.4725 points
Brief history of company is described but key points are missing or needs more clarification on some aspects.
(0.441 - 0.5039)
|
0.4095 points
Brief history is discussed but does not fit the facts provided or inaccurate statements made.
(0.378 - 0.4409)
|
0 points
Brief history not discussed.
(0 – 0.3779)
|
Content: Vision and Mission
|
1.05 points
Mission and vision statements align with what is envisioned; why appropriate is explained and planning is described accurately and comprehensively delivering all relevant information.
(0.945 - 1.05)
|
0.8925 points
Mission and vision statements align with what is envisioned; why appropriate is explained and planning is described sufficiently but is not completely accurate or comprehensive and is missing relevant information.
(0.84 - 0.9449)
|
0.7875 points
Mission and vision statements align with what is envisioned; why appropriate is explained and planning is described but key points are missing or needs more clarification on some aspects.
(0.735 - 0.839)
|
0.6825 points
Mission and vision statements align with what is envisioned; why appropriate is explained and planning is not fully discussed; does does not fit the facts provided or inaccurate statements made.
(0.63 - 0.7349)
|
0 points
Mission and vision statements align with what is envisioned; why appropriate is explained and planning is not identified and there is no discussion.
(0 – 0.629)
|
Content: Organizational Structure
|
1.47 points
Past organizational structure described and new one created for entire company and why the structure is appropriate and why other structures are not appropriate are described accurately and comprehensively delivering all relevant information.
(1.323 - 1.47)
|
1.2495 points
Past organizational structure described and new one created for entire company and why the structure is appropriate and why other structures are not appropriate are described sufficiently but is not completely accurate or comprehensive and is missing relevant information.
(1.176 - 1.322)
|
1.1025 points
Past organizational structure described and new one created for entire company and why the structure is appropriate is explained and why other structures are not appropriate are described but key points are missing or needs more clarification on some aspects.
(1.029 - 1.175)
|
0.95555 points
Past Organizational structure for entire company described, and why the new structure is appropriate and why other structures are not appropriate are not all described; does not fit the facts provided or several inaccurate statements are made.
(0.882 - 1.028)
|
0 points
Past Organizational structure described and a new one created for entire company, why the structure is appropriate, and why other structures are not discussed.
(0 – 0.881)
|
Content: Organizational Chart
|
1.47 points
Organizational chart for the new structure with roles and people discussed accurately and comprehensively delivering all relevant information.
(1.323 - 1.47)
|
1.2495 points
Organizational chart for the new structure with roles and people discussed sufficiently but is not completely accurate or comprehensive and is missing relevant information.
(1.176 - 1.322)
|
1.1025 points
Organizational chart for the new structure with roles and people discussed but key points are missing or needs more clarification on some aspects.
(1.029 - 1.175)
|
0.95555 points
Organizational chart for the new structure with roles, and people discussed but does not fit the facts provided; may have inaccurate information or statements made or not all of the required elements are presented.
(0.882 - 1.028)
|
0 points
Organizational chart for the new structure with the roles, and people are not presented or discussed.
(0 – 0.881)
|
Content: Organizational Culture
|
1.47 points
Past Organizational culture is not described and a new one created for entire company that aligns with vision is created and described accurately and comprehensively delivering all relevant information.
(1.323 - 1.47)
|
1.2495 points
Past Organizational culture is not described and a new one created for entire company that aligns with vision is created and described sufficiently but is not completely accurate or comprehensive and is missing relevant information.
(1.176 - 1.322)
|
1.1025 points
Past Organizational culture is not described and a new one created for entire company aligns with vision is created and described but key points are missing or needs more clarification on some aspects.
(1.029 - 1.175)
|
0.95555 points
Past Organizational culture is not described and a new one created for entire company but does not align with vision or what is provided has inaccurate information or statements.
(0.882 - 1.028)
|
0 points
Past Organizational culture is not described and a new one created for entire company is not provided or discussed.
(0 – 0.881)
|
Content: How new organizational structure and culture affect the planning and organizing facet of business and prevent future mishaps
|
1.26 points
How new organizational structure and culture affect the planning and organizing of business and prevent future mishaps are described accurately and comprehensively delivering all relevant information.
(1.134 - 1.26)
|
1.071 points
How new organizational structure and culture affect the planning and organizing of business and prevent future mishaps are described sufficiently but is not completely accurate or comprehensive and is missing relevant information.
(1.008 - 1.133)
|
0.945 points
How new organizational structure and culture affect the planning and organizing of business and prevent future mishaps are described but key points are missing or needs more clarification on some aspects.
(0.882 - 1.007)
|
0.819 points
How new organizational structure and culture affect the planning and organizing of business and prevent future mishaps are superficially discussed; has inaccurate information or statements.
(0.756 - 0.8819)
|
0 points
How new organizational structure and culture affect the planning and organizing of business and prevent future mishaps is not discussed.
(0 – 0.755)
|
Critical Thinking/Reasoning
|
4.2 points
Concepts and ideas are fully developed. Thinking is consistent in accurately interpreting questions and material/provides solid assumptions, reasoning and evaluation with sound conclusions. Reader can easily follow the author's logic and reasoning.
(3.78 - 4.2)
|
3.57 points
Concepts and ideas are developed. Thinking is mostly consistent in accurately interpreting questions and material/ provides good assumptions, reasoning and evaluation with sound conclusions. Reader can easily follow the author's logic and reasoning.
(3.36 – 3.77 )
|
3.15 points
Concepts and ideas are mostly developed but may need clarification on some aspects of thinking, reasoning or evaluation. Conclusions are drawn. Reader follows the author’s logic but occasionally there are areas that are unclear.
(2.94 – 3.35)
|
2.73 points
Concepts and ideas are not cohesive. Misinterprets questions or material; ignores or superficially evaluates, justifies little and seldom explains reasoning; draws unwarranted conclusions. At times, the reader must attempt to determine the author's train of thought.
(2.52 – 2.93)
|
0 points
Concepts and ideas are not fully developed or presented in a cohesive manner. Misinterprets questions or material.
(0 – 2.51)
|
Application of Resources
|
4.2 points
Arguments or positions are well-supported with evidence from the readings/experience; ideas go beyond the course material and recognize implications and extensions of the material and concepts.
(3.78 - 4.2)
|
3.57 points
Arguments or positions are mostly supported by evidence from the readings and course content; ideas presented demonstrate understanding of the material and concepts.
(3.36 – 3.77)
|
3.15 points
Arguments are more often based on opinion or unclear views than on position grounded in the readings of material or external sources of material.
(2.94 – 3.35)
|
2.73 points
Arguments are frequently illogical and unsubstantiated; Limited use of facts in case study and essential information presented in resources; May resort to ad hominem attacks on the author instead of making meaningful application of the material.
(2.52 – 2.93)
|
0 points
Arguments lack meaningful explanation or support of ideas. Does not provide facts presented in case study.
(0 – 2.51)
|
Attention to Instructions
|
2.1 points
demonstrated full understanding of requirements responded to each aspect of assignment
(1.89 – 2.1)
|
1.785 points
demonstrated understanding of requirements; missed one minor aspect of assignment
(1.68 – 1.88)
|
1.575 points
demonstrated some understanding of requirements; missed a key element or two minor aspects of assignment
(1.47 – 1.67)
|
1.365 points
failed to show a firm understanding of requirements; missed two key elements or several minor aspects of assignment
(1.26 – 1.46)
|
0 points
did not demonstrate understanding of assignment requirements
(0 – 1.25)
|
Writing Mechanics
|
2.1 points
Strictly adheres to standard usage rules of written English, including but not limited to capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. No errors found. No jargon used.
(1.89 – 2.1)
|
1.785 points
Adheres to standard usage of mechanics: conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. One to three errors found.
(1.68 – 1.88)
|
1.575 points
Minimally adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. Four to 10 errors found.
(1.47 – 1.67)
|
1.365 points
Does not adhere to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. More than 10 errors found.
(1.26 – 1.46)
|
0 points
Does not adhere to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of written English largely incomprehensible and errors are too plentiful to count.
(0 – 1.25)
|
APA Style (6th ed.)
|
1.05 points
No APA style errors; Proper citation of source material is used throughout paper. Reference titles follow APA with only the first word, the first word after a colon and proper nouns capitalized.
(0.945 - 1.05)
|
0.8925 points
Attempts in-text citations and reference list but one or two APA style errors noted.
(0.84 – 0.944)
|
0.7875 points
Attempts in-text citations and reference lists; APA style errors are noted; inconsistencies in citation usage are noted throughout document.
(0.735 – 0.839)
|
0.6825 points
Attempts either in-text citations or reference list but omits the other.
(0.63 – 0.734)
|
0 points
No attempt at APA style.
(0 – 0.629)
|
Overall Score
|
Outstanding
18.9 or more
|
Superior
16.8 or more
|
Good
14.7 or more
|
Substandard
12.6 or more
|
Failure
0 or more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|