How would you have improved the citizen’s decision-making for the hazard?
Please review the associated Quick Response reading (in your Resources area).
Extending from your readings, did the citizens have good information for decision-making for an avalanche hazard? Why or why not? How would you have improved the citizen’s decision-making for the hazard?
Summarize your opinion and be sure to provide an academic discussion and do not rely on common assumptions (min 250 words).
Extending your response, what would you put in a 72hr “go bag” and why? After looking at your fellow classmates “go bag” contents what you suggest they add or remove and why?
Be sure to respond to two of your classmates postings to receive full credit.
Quick Response Report Avalacnce .doc
Forum Feedback Rubrics.docx
rubric for Forums 300400 Level EDMG.docx